Posted on 21 August 2012.
The justification for Merck's marketing of vioxx was that it caused less gi side effects than other traditional NSAIDS. Merck claimed that if people used vioxx there would be less Gi side effects ending up in hospitlaizations and deaths than when using traditional pain relievers. Privately Merck consultant Loren Laine advised these claims were “bogus.” […]
Posted in Cases that Change AmericaComments Off on Study Provides Little Support for Merck’s Justification for Selling Vioxx
Posted on 13 August 2012.
Posted in Consumer ProtectionComments Off on Are the Drugs You Are Prescribed Safe?
Posted on 20 July 2012.
The following is excerpt from the article by Dr. Jerry Avorn published today in the New England Journal The Journal played a centralrole in two prominent drug-safe-ty developments of the 21st cen-tury, involving the cyclooxygen-ase-2 inhibitor rofecoxib (Vioxx)and the oral hypoglycemic agentrosiglitazone (Avandia). Accord- stroke (2005a). Accumulating evi-dence clarified that the VIGORfindings on myocardial infarctionwere […]
Posted in Consumer ProtectionComments Off on Drug Scandals Exposed in New England Journal
Reputation for Gaming, Gaming And you may Bookmakers
Reputation for Gaming, Gaming And you may Bookmakers
Most recent Ports Free Spin No-deposit Incentives
100 percent free Revolves No-deposit Canada
Cosmic Chance Slot From the Netent
Merchandising Wagering Urban centers Inside New york
